Posts Tagged ‘prayer’

FBI SPY FLYER

When I stopped laughing long enough to be wipe my eyes and breath, I thought I would add a fourth part to this series of posts.
Remember that flyer from the FBI that was posted on WND that I showed and talked about in my post “FBI’s most wanted list Part II”?

I just wanted to Hi-lite a few things from that flyer, and a few of the many reasons why it is so incredibly stupid.

Obviously whoever wrote it never took a class on Critical Thinking 101 or ever learned about logical errors or even has any logic for that matter.

1. According to the flyer, as you can see, Crocodile Dundee has to be a terrorist worthy of being arrested. He is not only interested in using dynamite for a purpose other than it was intended for, he did use it…
Pay close attention to the end of this video for proof that Crocodile Dundee is a terrorist.

2. According to this section, I must be a terrorist because I’m missing parts of two of my fingers on my right hand. Never mind the fact that they were severed on a gasket cutting machine in an industrial accident when I was only nineteen.
3. According to this section, FEMA has to be infested with terrorists. Look at the official FEMA website… http://www.fema.gov/areyouready/assemble_disaster_supplies_kit.shtm
Look at this snip from their website:

According this this flyer it’s a sin to just be a wise steward of their money, who isn’t stupid enough to use a credit card for everything and spend a tremendous amount on interest rates when you don’t have to.

And sense when is it a criminal act to protect your identity from everyone who asks for it.
I went to a medical clinic and they asked for my social security number and I told them they didn’t need it. Am I a terrorist? Don’t think so Tim!

Advertisements

google search for picture of statue of Liberty and 4th of July fireworks- http://www.crazywebsite.com

Ever since its inception, the FBI has been one of the most respected Law enforcement agencies in the world.
I highly respect law enforcement for all that they do for us. They are to be honored for protecting citizens all across the country. However, unfortunately, it seems the Federal Bureau of Investigation, has changed itself drastically into the Federal Bureau of Idiots.
The previous two posts were about the FBI putting out a flyer encouraging owners and workers of hotels, motels, sporting-goods stores and surplus stores to spy and report on their fellow Americans.
Why this flyer should make you laugh, scream with anger, and cry with sadness all at the same time.
1. This is America home of the brave, not Amerikka home of the snitch!
2. Our country was founded by people who thought the very thing that the FBI is calling terrorism was the principle on which this country was founded.
3. Are we going to get arrested for going backpacking or camping now? Think about it, they want stores to report purchases of waterproof matches and meals ready to eat.
4. They want stores to report people who are buying something and don’t know anything about what they are buying. (Am I the only one who thinks this is incredibly stupid?) We’d have to report and arrest everyone over the age of 55 who buys a computer for the first time, or women who buy sports equipment for their husbands. Who would be left?
5. If the founding fathers that wrote, signed and fought for the Declaration of Independence were still alive, the FBI would apparently want them spied on and probably arrested for terrorism.
6. The majority of gun owners and sporting-goods stores and “surplus” stores hate liberals and believe in the patriotic American way of life. What makes the FBI think that they would go out of their way to spy on American citizens like a bunch of communists in cold war Soviet Union?
7. Why should we spy on born and bred US Citizens when the Federal Government has turned a blind eye to people that aren’t even from this country who have known ties to terrorists, if not terrorists themselves?
When did it become a crime in America to be proud of your patriotic roots? When did it become a crime to speak your mind?
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states:
Amendment 1 – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression ratified on 12/15/1791. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Does any part of that flyer smell like the stench of Anti American governmental control to anyone else?
Yet sadly, most of America is more concerned about what outfits Lady Gaga (who’s no lady) and Heidi Klum are going to wear, than they are about their rights being slowly swiped out of their grasp by their own government which is supposed to protect those rights.
It’s no wonder Obama rushed to induct Kegan into the Justice Hall of shame aka our Supreme Court. She not only violated a federal law and got away with it (as Dean of Harvard Law she denied the US military recruiters space to recruit on campus), she also was the first dean in the history of Harvard Law to remove Constitutional law from the curriculum and add European style law.

USMagazine, Friday, June 17, 2011, 6:44am (PDT)

  • Angie’s good deeds continue!

     Angelina Jolie touches down in Altinozu, Turkey, on Friday afternoon, where she’ll meet with nearly 10,000 refugees from war-torn Syria.

    The Associated Press reports that 36-year-old Jolie, Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner, will be greeted at the refugee camp with a 16-yard banner reading “Goodness Angel of the World, Welcome.”

     The refugees have fled Syria due to a violent crackdown on anti-government protesters.

     Jolie, whose last humanitarian visit was to Tunisia (where thousands had fled from Libya) in April, is currently staying with Brad Pitt and their six kids in an $11 million mansion in Malta. Pitt, 47, is filming “World War Z” in the southern European nation.


  • While I feel sorry for the People of Syria that had to flee to Turkey, they obviously have no clue what an angel is!

Adolph Hitler giving a speech

If you read my recent article First they came… Part I and you are under 40, you are probably asking yourself, “What’s this conservative old goat talking about.” “Why do I care what happened to some stupid German preacher over 50 years ago, in another century?”
You would do very well to ask yourself that.
History to some is a very boring subject, filled with yawns and annoying test questions. But to anyone with the ability to have a cognitive thought swimming around in that soup called grey matter… you know that those who have forgotten the past are doomed to repeat it.
Again, you are probably thinking what does this have to do with me? The answer my friend is not blowing in the wind… Again, the answer is those who are ignorant, and entertainment happy enough to forget history, are destined to repeat it.
Well if you are under the age of 40, especially if you are attending college, I would suggest you delve into a place called a library and do some research.
While technically Nazism was Fascism and there is a slight difference between Fascism in its goals and Socialism, the way they go about achieving their goals are very similar, frighteningly and shockingly similar.
As described so well in an essay article in the archives of Lawrence University, under the heading Lawrence University Students of “Objectivism” on http://www.lawrence.edu/sorg/objectivism/socfasc.htm
A common definition of fascism: “A governmental system with strong centralized power, permitting no opposition or criticism, controlling all affairs of the nation (industrial, commercial, etc.)” (American College Dictionary, New York: Random House, 1957).
Socialist states have included the USSR(1), Communist China, socialist Sweden, socialist England, Cuba, North Korea, and a handful of lesser regimes in Eastern Europe, East Africa, and Southeast Asia. Once again, there is a prima facie difficulty in determining what factor these various states held in common. After all, some socialist regimes (like Sweden’s and England’s) were elected democratically. Others, like the USSR’s and the PRC’s, were the result of popular violent revolutions. Still others were the product of either military coup (Cuba, Ethiopia, Vietnam) or foreign invasion (the Eastern Bloc). The trait common to all of these is provided, once again by the definition of socialism: “a theory or system of social organization which advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means or production, capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole” (American College Dictionary).
Once we remember the possibility of the existence of such a system, the differences between socialism and fascism become trivial, superficial and, above all, non-essential. Differentiation of socialism and fascism from capitalism permits the recognition of their similarity. They do differ from each other, but only in the way in which the scalene and the isosceles differ from each other: in degree, but not in kind. Socialism and fascism are each forms of statism,(sic) forms of government in which the government is given complete or extensive control over the lives of its citizens.
This theoretical consideration has massive consequences in the practical realm: The differences we noted before turn out not to be as important as we once might have thought.
Adolph Hitler himself stated,
I have learned a great deal from Marxism, as I do not hesitate to admit. The difference between them and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlers and penpushers have timidly begun…I had only to develop logically what Social Democracy repeatedly failed in because of its attempt to realize its evolution within the framework of democracy. National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could have broken its absurd and artificial ties with the democratic order.
(Hitler to Rauschning, The Voice of Destruction, pg. 186).
________________________________________
As discussed in the first article, Adolph Hitler took advantage of a cultural, economic, and religious vacuum in post WW I Germany. He was a master strategist. He was megalomaniacal and believed to be frightfully mad, and an occultist with almost no equal in the early twentieth century, but he was equally ruthless and cunning and an excellent recruiter of like-minded individuals. He was excellent at delegating tasks amongst a protected and private group of party leaders. ________________________________________
He was a brilliant orator. Even sixty plus years later, when one listens to an old film reel of Hitler speak, the hairs stand up on the back of your neck.
Hitler knew enough to speak accordingly to different audiences. He promised tax cuts to farmers, and in rural areas spoke of redistribution of wealth. Despite being severely outnumbered by his critics and opponents, Hitler became the Chancellor in January 1933. The main reason for his victory once again was the horrific economic conditions and spiritual unrest of the nation after the nation’s defeat in WW I. The night that Hitler was named Chancellor was fortuitous for the Nazi party as many of the leading industrialists came forward and called for Hitler because they said he was the only one strong enough as Chancellor to keep the coming Bolshevik revolution from overtaking Germany. ________________________________________
The Nazi Party was originally the German Workers Party (GWP). In the spring of 1920, Hitler suggested that they change their name to the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP). Hitler hated the socialists and communists and Russians in general. However he was politically savvy enough to know that after WW I Socialism was a popular philosophy. But he wanted to maintain the integral part of his belief that Jews and non-Germans were inferior, the NSDAP published its programme which became known as the 25 points. The party refused to accept the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, and to reinforce their ideas on Nationalism, equal rights were only for German citizens.
In an appeal to the working class and socialists, the programme included several measures that would redistribute income and war profits, profit sharing in large industries, nationalization of trusts, increases in old age pensions and free education. ________________________________________
Hitler was such a fantastic orator, that many times the large crowds that followed him and gathered at his speeches would erupt in violence. On one such occasion the crowd erupted in violence and brutally beat a rival politician. Hitler himself was imprisoned for three months for having a part in the riot. When Hitler was released he began forming his own private army called the Sturm Abteilung (Storm Section) These brutes and thugs were also known as Storm Troopers or Brown Shirts. They were soon to be led by one Hermann Goering. ________________________________________
Hitler and his thugs were seen by many to be too aggressive and violent in his speeches to entice violence against the liberal socialists. In the 1928 German National elections, less than 3% voted for the Nazi Party.
In 1929 Hitler and the Nazi party found themselves blessed by fortune, in that the Wall Street Crash of October 1929 caused a United States, desperate for capital, to begin to recall loans from Europe. One of the consequences was rapid unemployment and an economy which relied heavily on investment from the United States collapsed worse than any other European nation. Before the 1929 crash, 1.25 million people were unemployed in Germany. Towards the end of 1930, the numbers reached over 4 million.
Hitler who had been considered a dangerous fool in 1928 when he had predicted an economic disaster was now being seen as brilliant.
There were many times where Hitler was called a Messiah of his time.
________________________________________

Finally after almost three years of
trying to hide his birth certificate from the American people that voted him
into the Whitehouse, Obama finally outs  his long form Birth Certificate.

Oddly enough though…. Read the very interesting article below from WND, written by a #1 best selling author…

A tale of two birth certificates

‘Rosetta Stone’ documents provide comparison


Posted: April 28, 2011
10:17 pm Eastern

By Jerome R.
Corsi

© 2011 WorldNetDaily

That Obama’s birth certificate lists a
registrar that appears remarkably like a
forger’s signature joke on the word “ukulele” is not the only peculiarity
observed in comparing the president’s record with other long-form Hawaiian birth certificates that have been fully
authenticated.The question is whether the Obama birth record the White House released
Wednesday is an authentic photocopy of an original 1961 vital record or a
modern-day forgery.


Image
released by the White House April 27,
2011

The Rosetta Stone for determining the authenticity of the Obama birth
document is the long-form birth certificates for the Nordyke twins, which WND discovered and authenticated in
July 2009
.


Birth certificate of Gretchen
Nordyke, one of two twin sisters born at what was known in 1961 as the Kapiolani
Maternity & Gynecological Hospital in Honolulu,
Hawaii.

A side-by-side comparison of the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates with the
Obama birth certificate the White House released yesterday reveals many
differences, some with regard to content, others to format.

  • In the Nordyke twins’ birth certificate, in Box 20, “Date Accepted by Local
    Reg.” and Box 22, “Date Accepted by Reg. General,” the date is stamped “AUG 11
    1961,” while the date is stamped on Obama’s birth certificate as “AUG -8 1961,”
    with a dash before the middle number designating the day.
  • In the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates, the type in Box 8, “Name of the
    Father” lines up to the right margin with the typing in the next three boxes
    below, while in the Obama birth certificate, the typing in Box 10, “Age of
    Father,” and Box 15, “Age of Mother,” are indented below the “R” in “Barack” in
    Box 8.
  • In the Nordyke twins’s birth certificate, the type in Box 9, “Race of
    Father,” Box 12b, “Kind of Business or Industry,” and Box 14, “Race of Mother,”
    line up to the left margin of the box (in all three boxes for Susan Elizabeth
    Nordyke and in two of the three boxes for Gretchen Carter Nordyke), while in the
    Obama birth certificate, the type in each of these three boxes is indented from
    the right box margin, with varying indent spacing in each line.
  • In Box 16, “Birthplace of Mother,” in the Nordyke twins’ birth certificate,
    the letters of “Los Angeles, California,” are aligned at the bottom margin,
    while in the Obama birth certificate, the “K” in Kansas rides up and appears
    only partially struck at the top.
  • The left-margin alignment in the boxes throughout the Nordyke twins’ birth
    certificates suggest a typewriter was set up to fill in information by tabbing
    through the document, as compared to the more irregular content of the
    information filled in the boxes on the Obama birth certificate.
  • The typed letters in the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates appear
    irregularly spaced, often run together, as in the capital letters of the boxes
    stating the name of the father and mother, while the typed letters in the Obama
    birth certificate appear evenly spaced, not run together, not even with the
    capital letters in the boxes stating the name of the father and the mother Boxes
    8 and 13). Again, the differences more strongly suggest the Nordyke twins’ birth
    certificates were prepared on a manual typewriter.
  • In Box 3, “This Birth,” the “X” marking “Twins” in the Nordyke twins’ birth
    certificates strikes the box upper left, as is the case with Box 4, “If Twin or
    Triple, Was Child Born,” while Box 3 in Obama’s is struck top right.
  • Similar differences in how the “X” strikes the boxes can be seen in Box 6d
    and 7e where the “X” on Obama’s birth certificate fits squarely into the box,
    drifting toward the top, and the “X” in the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates
    fall high and to the right in the boxes provided.
  • The Nordyke twins’ birth certificates in Box 5a lists the birthdate as Aug.
    5, 1961, with the month abbreviated, while Obama’s in Box 5a lists the birthdate
    as August 4, 1961, with the month spelled out.
  • In the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates the “H” in “Honolulu” in Boxes 7a
    and 7c drifts high above the horizontal of the other typed letters, while in
    Obama’s birth certificate the “H” in “Honolulu” is consistently on line with the
    other letters in the word.
  • The dates stamped in the Nordyke twins
    birth certificates in Boxes 20 and 22 appear irregularly stamped, at an angle,
    while the date stamps in the Obama birth certificate appear more evenly on line,
    at the center of the boxes, even if a bit high in the box.
  • The local registrar in the Nordyke twins’ birth certificate, Box 21, is
    different than the local registrar who signed the Obama birth certificate. Was
    there more than one local registrar operating to process birth certificates from
    Kapiolani hospital at this time?
  • The Nordyke twins’ birth certificate at the bottom have the printed
    signature of the director of health and the registrar general, along with the
    date the copies were issued, “5-5-1966,” while the Obama birth certificate has
    no similar official designations indicating the date on which the copy was
    issued or that the copy was certified by the director of health and the
    registrar general to be a “true and correct copy” of the original record on file
    in the Research, Planning and Statistics Office of the Hawaii State Department
    of Health.
  • The Norydke twins’ birth certificates appear white against black, in the
    format typical of 1960s Photostats, while the Obama birth certificate appears to
    be a machine copy printed on hash-marked Department of Health paper; yet in
    Obama’s modern photocopy, a black space at the top appears created by the fold
    of the paper at the top left corner into the binder and no similar indentation
    is seen in the Nordyke twins’s photostatic copy.

Some of these differences may be explained by different people preparing the
documents on different typewriters, yet how two different formats appear in the
date stamp used in Boxes 20 and 22 is more difficult to explain if the Obama
birth certificate is legitimate.

Both the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates and the Obama birth certificate
identify the birth hospital as Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital,
even though there has been considerable Internet discussion that that was not the official name of
the hospital in 1961.

After Hawaii Gov. Neil
Abercrombie dismissed Dr. Neil Palafox from being appointed director of
health
, there may have been no one heading the Hawaiian Department of Health
to sign off on the authenticity of the Obama birth document.

Still, it remains remarkable that the Hawaii Department of Health and the
White House released the Obama birth certificate without the type of
authenticating information that appears at the bottom of the Nordyke twins’
birth certificates.

The SmokingGun.com
website notes several additional irregularities
with the Obama birth
certificate that do not appear on the Nordyke twin’s birth certificates:

  • In Box 3, “This Birth,” there are two “Xs” above “Twin” and “Triplet” – why
    are these “Xs” here and what do they signify?
  • What is the meaning of the smudges in the Obama birth certificate in the box
    containing the name of the attending physician?
  • What is the significance of the numbers, seen vertically, on the right side
    of the Obama birth certificate?

WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth
dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke
twins’ birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:

  • As WND reported, the numbers
    on the long-form birth certificates issued by Kapi’olani to the Nordyke twins
    are lower than the number given President Obama, even though the president’s
    birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a
    certificate number three days earlier.
  • Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5,
    1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the
    Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
  • Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug. 5,
    1961, and was given Certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with
    the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.
  • Yet, according to the Certification
    of Live Birth released by FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential
    campaign
    – and now according to the long-form, hospital-generated birth
    certificate the White House released yesterday – Barack Obama was given a higher
    certificate number than the Nordyke twins.
  • Barack Obama was given Certificate No. 151 – 1961 – 10641, even though he
    was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was
    registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on
    Aug. 8, 1961.

WND has previously reported on information discrepancies between the birth
dates, certificate numbers and registration numbers in comparing the Nordyke
twins’ birth certificates to the Obama birth certificate:

In 1961, the birth certificate numbers were not assigned by the hospitals.

Instead, the numbers were stamped to the birth record by the Hawaii
Department of Health at the main office in Honolulu.

This is the only place birth certificate numbers were assigned.

At the last step of the process, the documents were accepted by the registrar
general, with the date of registration filled into box No. 22 on the lower right
hand corner of the long-form birth certificate.

The date the birth document was accepted by the registrar general was the
same date the birth certificate number was stamped on the birth record.

The birth certificate number was stamped on the form by a rubber stamp that
automatically increased the birth certificate number by one each time the birth
certificate was stamped.

The question is, in 1961, how was it possible that the Nordyke twins had
their birth certificates accepted by the registrar general in Hawaii three days
later than the registrar general accepted Obama’s birth certificate, when their
birth certificate numbers are lower than Obama’s number?

At the time the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates were discovered, WND
displayed copies of the two documents to make clear the limited information
contained in the short-form Certification of Live Birth that Obama supporters at
that time were claiming was the only Obama birth record needed to prove a
Hawaiian birth.

In a recorded interview with WND, Eleanor Nordyke said she had no
recollection of Ann Dunham having been in the hospital at the same time she
delivered her twin daughters.

“I was in such pain delivering the twins,” Mrs. Nordyke said, “that I have
very little recollection of the experience at all, except for the pain.”

Neither the White House nor the Hawaii Department of Health has yet provided
an original copy of the Obama birth certificate for forensic examination.

Read more: A tale of two birth
certificates
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292717#ixzz1L3aT2emi

Glen Beck on cover of Newsmax Magazine

Newsmax Magazine cover

Newsmax

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 01:20 PM
By: Newsmax Wires

NEW YORK — Glenn Beck will leave his Fox News Channel show this year,  although an announcement from the network and his production company today did not include his final departure date.

In a joint news release, the network and Beck’s Mercury Radio Arts announced
that Fox News and his company will work together to “develop and produce a
variety of television projects for air on the Fox News Channel as well as
content for other platforms including Fox News’ digital properties.”

Beck became a sensation almost immediately after jumping from HLN to Fox for an
afternoon program. But his viewership has declined lately, The Associated Press
noted.

Among other things, he had faced an advertiser boycott that
limited the amount of companies that wanted to be a part of his show after
saying President Barack Obama had a “deep-seated hatred for white people.”

Beck’s statement expressed gratitude to Fox News chief Roger Ailes “for the
lessons I’ve learned and will continue to learn from him and I look forward to
starting this new phase of our partnership.”

_____________________________________________________________
**Note – The following is an opinion on the above article:

Many Christian viewers of Beck’s show, expressed frustration with Beck and stopped watching his show, after his big powwow on the Lincoln Memorial where he expressed his alignment with the Morman belief that we can express our spiritual deity and bring God’s kingdom to earth.

Many Christians only started listening to him because of a Christian named Brannon Howse who had been communicating with Glenn Beck for years and trying to witness to him. Howse appreciated Beck’s stand for the truth and fed him many important pieces of information that made it to Beck’s tv show.

If Beck had stuck with his original platform and avoided his new spritualistic Mormon propoganda there wouldn’t have been the fallout of viewers over the last six months.

©
Newsmax. All rights reserved.

But surrounding them are a bunch of gutless sheep… the following video was found on youtube… a whole table of Congressmen answering questions from young marines and one question in particular made them a bunch of bleeting mindless sheep, except for Rep. Allen West…