Posts Tagged ‘Christianity’

FBI SPY FLYER

When I stopped laughing long enough to be wipe my eyes and breath, I thought I would add a fourth part to this series of posts.
Remember that flyer from the FBI that was posted on WND that I showed and talked about in my post “FBI’s most wanted list Part II”?

I just wanted to Hi-lite a few things from that flyer, and a few of the many reasons why it is so incredibly stupid.

Obviously whoever wrote it never took a class on Critical Thinking 101 or ever learned about logical errors or even has any logic for that matter.

1. According to the flyer, as you can see, Crocodile Dundee has to be a terrorist worthy of being arrested. He is not only interested in using dynamite for a purpose other than it was intended for, he did use it…
Pay close attention to the end of this video for proof that Crocodile Dundee is a terrorist.

2. According to this section, I must be a terrorist because I’m missing parts of two of my fingers on my right hand. Never mind the fact that they were severed on a gasket cutting machine in an industrial accident when I was only nineteen.
3. According to this section, FEMA has to be infested with terrorists. Look at the official FEMA website… http://www.fema.gov/areyouready/assemble_disaster_supplies_kit.shtm
Look at this snip from their website:

According this this flyer it’s a sin to just be a wise steward of their money, who isn’t stupid enough to use a credit card for everything and spend a tremendous amount on interest rates when you don’t have to.

And sense when is it a criminal act to protect your identity from everyone who asks for it.
I went to a medical clinic and they asked for my social security number and I told them they didn’t need it. Am I a terrorist? Don’t think so Tim!

google search for picture of statue of Liberty and 4th of July fireworks- http://www.crazywebsite.com

Ever since its inception, the FBI has been one of the most respected Law enforcement agencies in the world.
I highly respect law enforcement for all that they do for us. They are to be honored for protecting citizens all across the country. However, unfortunately, it seems the Federal Bureau of Investigation, has changed itself drastically into the Federal Bureau of Idiots.
The previous two posts were about the FBI putting out a flyer encouraging owners and workers of hotels, motels, sporting-goods stores and surplus stores to spy and report on their fellow Americans.
Why this flyer should make you laugh, scream with anger, and cry with sadness all at the same time.
1. This is America home of the brave, not Amerikka home of the snitch!
2. Our country was founded by people who thought the very thing that the FBI is calling terrorism was the principle on which this country was founded.
3. Are we going to get arrested for going backpacking or camping now? Think about it, they want stores to report purchases of waterproof matches and meals ready to eat.
4. They want stores to report people who are buying something and don’t know anything about what they are buying. (Am I the only one who thinks this is incredibly stupid?) We’d have to report and arrest everyone over the age of 55 who buys a computer for the first time, or women who buy sports equipment for their husbands. Who would be left?
5. If the founding fathers that wrote, signed and fought for the Declaration of Independence were still alive, the FBI would apparently want them spied on and probably arrested for terrorism.
6. The majority of gun owners and sporting-goods stores and “surplus” stores hate liberals and believe in the patriotic American way of life. What makes the FBI think that they would go out of their way to spy on American citizens like a bunch of communists in cold war Soviet Union?
7. Why should we spy on born and bred US Citizens when the Federal Government has turned a blind eye to people that aren’t even from this country who have known ties to terrorists, if not terrorists themselves?
When did it become a crime in America to be proud of your patriotic roots? When did it become a crime to speak your mind?
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states:
Amendment 1 – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression ratified on 12/15/1791. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Does any part of that flyer smell like the stench of Anti American governmental control to anyone else?
Yet sadly, most of America is more concerned about what outfits Lady Gaga (who’s no lady) and Heidi Klum are going to wear, than they are about their rights being slowly swiped out of their grasp by their own government which is supposed to protect those rights.
It’s no wonder Obama rushed to induct Kegan into the Justice Hall of shame aka our Supreme Court. She not only violated a federal law and got away with it (as Dean of Harvard Law she denied the US military recruiters space to recruit on campus), she also was the first dean in the history of Harvard Law to remove Constitutional law from the curriculum and add European style law.

FBI's most wanted list

If you see these men report them to the FBI

DO YOU KNOW THESE MEN? THE FBI WANTS THESE MEN FOR CRIMES OF HIGH TREASON AND TERRORISM!

 

New Hampshire:

Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:

John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:

Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:

Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:

William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:

Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:

Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:

Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:

Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:

George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:

William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:

Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:

Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Yes this is meant to be a bit of tongue and cheek but when you read Part II it’s not so funny any more.

I was originally going to send this to this persons email, but his website doesn’t give any way to contact him, so this is just an open post for him to respond to in case he ever sees it.
Feel free to respond whether you agree or disagree.

Hello Mr. Stewart,
This is a letter that I’m going to post on my blog https://1personofdifference.wordpress.com
I Post this in response to your article “It’s the Blood of Jesus!” on your blog page:
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Believer’s%20Corner/Doctrines/blood.htm
I and my wife have been going to your website for quite some time as we are researchers and concerned by the heresies and apostasy going on in God’s church today. One major heresy and apostasy is hyper focusing on something that is not crucial to salvation and making something to be more than it is to be divisive and cause confusion in the church. I would strongly urge you to rethink your stance on this and to repent and also to apologize to John Macarthur for the deplorable way that you have accused him of not being a Christian brother. This letter is in hopes of edification not of pointing fingers. Paul tells us what we are supposed to do when a brother is wrong and I do so humbly and with love.
While I agree with you wholeheartedly about the Seventh Day Adventist’s being severely incorrect in a lot of things and being cultish in nature, I think you are way off and on the fringe of participating in heretical acts.
If you have had any change in your beliefs but have yet to change your website I would welcome any comments to my blog post.
This is not to attack you; you did enough attacking in your comments about John Macarthur. We are called to be discerners, rightly dividing the word of truth by brother Paul in 2 Timothy.
There is a specific misunderstanding in your desire to promote the blood of Jesus over Jesus himself.
What is my argument that what you are saying is heresy? The argument that I have laid forth and answered in these pages is that you are in essence saying that Jesus’ birth, earthly testimony, torture, death, burial, resurrection into heaven is not enough to save us, that he had to perform a final work. This after jumping all over the Seventh Day Adventists for the heresy of requiring works to enter into heaven in their pushing of the “Work of investigative judgment”.
You are attempting to get us to believe that Christ’s work on the cross was not enough he had to perform a “work” of his one, before he could atone for our sins. This idea of yours doesn’t seem the slightest bit heretical too you? When Jesus said, “It is Finished” he was talking about the need for the Old Testament and its need for animal sacrifice as a temporary atonement each time an Israelite sinned. He was also saying there would be a new Passover and it would bring the Holy Spirit into our lives. We would no longer need a physical sprinkling of a lambs blood over our doors to protect us from the Spirit of Death. We have the forever lamb’s blood in our hearts which as Paul tells us is the living temple, sanctified and held holy by the spirit who is the physical/spiritual embodiment of Jesus our High Priest.
Why do we not see in the word of God that our redemption wasn’t finished until he ceremoniously dripped his blood on the mercy seat. That is part of what was finished on the Cross, Old Testament rabbinical and priestly ceremony.
Hebrews 9:12 – Hebrews 10:19-42 – do indeed point to Christ’s blood, but to just simply see the blood as the be-all/end-all and to say there was more than the cross, is not only incorrect but heretical.
First, we know that the sacrificial lamb had to be without blemish. Christ was without blemish, both before and after his physical death.
By the time Jesus was talking to Mary, he had been buried in Joseph’s tomb, and the stone had been rolled away and he was gone… When the women came to care for his body (T)he Angel of the Lord said to them … “Who have you come for? He is raised from the dead.”
By the time Mary had come to seek him, Jesus had gone to the gates of hell in a representative fashion of our fallen state (The sins of the world were placed on him and God turned from him as God could have no sin, or know no sin. Since Jesus is part of the triune Godhead, Jesus had to literally be not only physically separated from the Holy Father but spiritually separated from the Father as well.) I personally think that is what scared him so much in the garden was the knowledge of that spiritual separation more than the physical death.
While I respect Dr. DeHaan and listened to the DeHaan clan on the radio for years, I think Dr. DeHaan was incorrect in several aspects in the piece you quoted from his book, “The Tabernacle.”
I don’t believe that what he was telling her was that he wasn’t consecrated yet. He was consecrated by the very fact that he was Jesus Christ. I believe he was cognizant as a man that Mary was a human, and she would probably have her hopes up that he would remain with them in his sanctified body so they could worship him on earth. Remember also that she was a Jew and the Jews of the day had the thought that the Messiah would bring God’s kingdom to earth and defeat the Roman tyranny. I think the reason he said don’t touch me was because he didn’t want her heart to be broken when he left. Even the men who were his disciples, who should have known better after following him everywhere for three years, had a hard time believing that he had returned from the dead. In fact this brings my point to bear that you and Dr. DeHaan are wrong in your ideas about why the Christ told Mary not to touch him. If you remember, at the time that he met the disciples in the upper room, he talked with Thomas, and because of Thomas’s doubts he told him to touch his hands and feel his wounds so that he would believe wholeheartedly. This would tell us that what you and Dr. DeHaan believe is wrong.
Remember he wasn’t just some guy walking around the outskirts of the city with bloody holes in his hands and feet, he was God as well as man. The very fact that he was the atonement for our sins through his death, burial and resurrection, means that he was consecrated to begin with because as we know from the Old Testament history the lamb had to be spotless. But there the comparison ends because he was not only spotless from birth but perfect and Holy. I believe that you are incorrect in your interpretation of scripture as to what our Lord Jesus meant when he said, “It is finished”.
Jesus was referring to the Old Testament covenant. What do I mean by that?
1. Jesus himself is now the Holy of Holies and the Mercy seat.
2. The Tabernacle is no longer necessary, as Paul tells us in Corinthians, and Jesus tells the Disciples before the day of Pentecost. The instant of our salvation, the Holy Spirit enters our body and our body becomes a living temple that we are required to treat with reverence and dignity.
3. As Jesus breathed his last breath on the Cross, darkness came over the whole earth. The Veil that covered the entrance of the Holy of Holies was ripped in two. This is significant in its timing following’ Jesus cry of “It is Finished!” He physically and spiritually became the lamb that was slain, without blemish, totally replacing the need for Old Testament restitution or atonement. No longer were our sins just covered over, but totally removed. As we read in the word, “totally blotted out from The Book of Life.”
4. As with most Old Testament history, the Passover was merely a foreshadowing of Jesus’ work on the Cross. The act of spreading the Lamb’s blood for the passing over of the spirit of death, was to be done by the head of each household. Yes the blood of a lamb was the Icon that the spirit of death was looking for, but the actual application of the blood was applied by human hands. Jesus as the son of man and the Son of God was the true personification of the lamb’s blood preventing the Spirit of Death from taking us to eternal spiritual damnation and death.
5. Where did Christ’s blood come from? It came from the Roman Centurions beating him, whipping him with a cat of 9 tails, and putting the Crown of Thorns on his head, then nailing his hands and feet to the Cross, then finally from the spear thrust into his side, blood and water flowed, mingled down.
Your hyper-fixation on Christ’s blood, and trying to say that he wasn’t sanctified before going up into heaven, and that Christ’s work wasn’t done on the cross simply because he hadn’t sprinkled the blood on the Mercy Seat yet is a damnable heresy and you are hoisted on your own Petard that you falsely accuse our Brother John Macarthur of.
He was already sanctified and holy before he came to earth so there was no need not to be touched, and as we already said he was touched by Thomas. There is no Biblical evidence that he had already ascended then re-descended before speaking with the Apostles, so the mere fact that Thomas touched him physically, totally destroys your argument.
Your assertions are not only wrong, but heretical because you are calling Jesus’ death on the cross an incomplete and insufficient work.
What Macarthur is saying is correct, while Christ’s blood is certainly a part of the sacrifice for our sins, it is not alone in its importance to our salvation. Jesus’ physical blood as it flowed through his veins was no different than yours or mine. It was needed to remain inside the body to sustain life, like water and food and nutrients. It is the penultimate culmination of Jesus sacrifice for us, but it is neither the only part nor the most important part. When you add the blood however to everything else however, it becomes the blood of the Lamb of God that washes away, not just covers our sins.
When John Macarthur states that his physical blood is merely a manifestation you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater and ignorantly or intentionally missing what Macarthur is saying.
The blood of a mere mortal would not atone for anyone’s sins. It is a factor among many factors.
1. Jesus is son of man and Son of God, a full part of the Holy Trinity.
2. Jesus had to make a way for an end-all/be-all for our sins.
3. Jesus was born a perfect birth through the spirit as foretold in Isaiah and other Old Testament proclamations
4. Jesus’ earthly life had two purposes, to wake the sleeping and point the way to eternal salvation in heaven and to glorify the Father.
5. Jesus taught that through him and his death, burial, and resurrection was the only path to salvation through faith. Isaiah tells us that the lamb came that he might be slaughtered and lifted up.
6. Christ was betrayed and through that betrayal, and the sins of the world, became totally separate from God for a short time so that the Holy Father, could bring to bear the full brunt of his judgment against his son for the guilt of the world.
7. He was prosecuted and persecuted and had a crown of thorns put on his head, beaten so bad he needed help walking, and then his hands and feet were nailed to a cross and then the cross was raised to cause torture and a slow death by suffocation.
8. He descended into hell, was raised again and seen by a large witness of people, and then was taken up into heaven where he sits on the throne next to God the Father.
In the following paragraph, Dr. DeHaan is completely wrong when he asserts that this is a comparison between the Old Testament priest and Christ as our new High Priest in the order of Melchizedek, “we remember that the high priest after he had offered the sacrifice, was to enter the holy of holies, before he did anything else, with the precious blood. No one was allowed to approach him. Everyone was shut out until this was completely done.”
When Christ died on the cross it was truly finished. To say that he had to go to heaven and sprinkle his blood on the Mercy Seat is heresy because it’s adding works to Christ’s gift of his death on the Cross at Calvary. Jesus was and is perfect, the son of man and the Son of God, nothing else was required. He is the mercy seat. He is the Holy of Holies and he resides in our hearts which is the new temple. Indeed, Christ’s blood was shed on the Mercy Seat, but it was done as he was dying on the Cross.
You mix metaphors with reality. You say that he had to go to heaven to sprinkle his blood on the Mercy Seat. Well if you are relating him as the high priest, then that is an incorrect and heretical assumption and adding to the word something that is never spoken. If Jesus tells us that the Holy Spirit is going to come down and fill us, and Paul tells us that the temple is now in our bodies, why would Jesus have to go to Heaven to the Mercy Seat when the Mercy Seat was in the temple in the Holy of Holies in the first place?
If God the Father sent his Son to die here on earth because he had to be a human with spiritual perfection, and all the Old Testament points to this like a lighthouse in the fog, why would his work on the Cross not complete our salvation and he had to go to Heaven?
By making this Heretical assumption, you are literally removing the holy deity of Christ, and his work on the Cross, and personifying a single part of the case of salvation.
We are not called to judge men or their salvation, we are called to seek out their fruits and judge their fruits. I see no fruit of heresy or lack of salvation on the part of John Macarthur. I may not 100% buy the 5 points of Calvinism but I would certainly not deny him as a brother in Christ, nor call him a heretic.
Jesus on the Cross said it was finished and it was! To add anything to that or take anything away from that is strongly warned about in Revelations 22.

USMagazine, Friday, June 17, 2011, 6:44am (PDT)

  • Angie’s good deeds continue!

     Angelina Jolie touches down in Altinozu, Turkey, on Friday afternoon, where she’ll meet with nearly 10,000 refugees from war-torn Syria.

    The Associated Press reports that 36-year-old Jolie, Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner, will be greeted at the refugee camp with a 16-yard banner reading “Goodness Angel of the World, Welcome.”

     The refugees have fled Syria due to a violent crackdown on anti-government protesters.

     Jolie, whose last humanitarian visit was to Tunisia (where thousands had fled from Libya) in April, is currently staying with Brad Pitt and their six kids in an $11 million mansion in Malta. Pitt, 47, is filming “World War Z” in the southern European nation.


  • While I feel sorry for the People of Syria that had to flee to Turkey, they obviously have no clue what an angel is!

A greek jackass, who's name potentially could be Chris.


A guy named Chris, who is an American Jackass.


Hey Matthews –
Are you being intentionally stupid, or worse, are you just pushing the Whitehouse’s official bye-line straight from Washington.
You seriously don’t get it that someone, who’s entrusted with working for American citizens, did something that shows stupidity, an extreme lack of morals and ethics, and betrayed the trust of his wife and his marriage vows. Like Clinton, this has nothing to do with what a man has done in the secrets of his bedroom, although he was incredibly wrong in what he did. It has everything to do with, if his own wife can’t trust him to stand up to his wedding vows, how can the citizens that voted him into office trust him? I don’t trust most politicians as far as I can throw a feather, but one who shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that he can’t be trusted by his actions, deserves to be evicted from his job. If I sent inappropriate and lewd pictures from a work computer in an office at a regular employer I would be fired without a moment’s notice. This man is also under investigation for sending these pictures to an underage female. What brilliant subterfuge do you want to spew to distract from that piece of news Chris?
Belows is an article that has to be evidence of one of the stupidest things ever said by an American so called journalist.
http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2011/20110610113105.aspx

Matthews: Weiner in Trouble Because His Behavior Offends ‘Culturally Backward’ Christian Conservatives

By: Geoffrey Dickens
Friday, June 10, 2011 11:42 AM EDT

On Thursday’s Hardball, Chris Matthews determined that Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner could be in danger of being forced out of Congress by Blue Dog Dems who face uphill battles in red states because, as he put it, “people in the rural areas of this country who are Christian conservative culturally – you can say backward if you want…don’t like this kind of stuff.”

During a discussion about Weiner’s chances of survival, after being caught sending lewd pictures to women via Twitter, the MSNBCer claimed the liberal congressman didn’t have to worry about his, according to Matthews, culturally superior constituents in New York – the “56 percent in Brooklyn and Queens” who “can live with this guy.” Instead he had to be concerned with his Democratic colleagues fearful about re-election in the “conservative culturally part of the country.”

The following excerpt was aired on the June 9 edition of Hardball:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: If you’re a Blue Dog Democrat from a conservative culturally part of the country, where you’re fighting out every election with two or three points to spare, if you’re a — if you’re are [Jim] Matheson from Utah or you’re from Oklahoma and you’re a [Dan] Boren — and he’s leaving Congress – your life’s getting difficult enough defending the East Coast and the left coast Democratic Party. They’re too far left. Look at what happened in Arkansas last year. It’s getting very, very hard to defend the behavior, politically, of the party. Now you throw on top of that immoral behavior, indiscrete behavior, embarrassing behavior, gross behavior like this, and you still have him in your midst. And that’s my question to you. If you’re Steny Hoyer, who does speak for the Blue Dogs, if you’re Nancy Pelosi, the former Speaker, who has to deal with them, don’t you have to deal with the fact – you’re losing any chance of getting back a 218 majority?

I want you to pick this up, Ben. This is, to me, the stakes here. If he stays, they never get the leadership back. They never get the Speakership back because the people in the rural areas of this country who are Christian conservative culturally – you can say backward if you want – but they don’t like this kind of stuff at all. They’re not part of that 56 percent in Brooklyn and Queens who say, “okay, we can live with this guy.” Your thoughts, Ben? Isn’t that the cutting edge of this?

— Geoffrey Dickens is the Deputy Research Director at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Geoffrey Dickens on Twitter.

Palin’s Painted Flag
a “Breach of Federal Law”

“The whole thing [Sarah Palin’s bus tour] could be in breach of a
federal law, because the United States Flag Code establishes important rules
for the use and display of the Stars and Stripes, the flag of the United
States. Under standards of respect and etiquette, it’s made clear that the flag
of the United States should never be used for any advertising purpose
whatsoever. Yet that’s precisely what Sarah Palin is doing. She’s using the
flag of the United States for her own financial purposes. She drapes herself in
the Stars and Stripes and makes millions of dollars in the process. This has
got nothing to do with the presidency and everything to do with filling her
pockets.”

— MSNBC’s Martin Bashir on his 3pm ET Martin Bashir, May 31.

Martin. Martin. Martin… please, go be a real journalist and find something really truly worthy of reporting. Perphaps watch the movie about Woodward and Bernstein, or perhaps the movie with Nick Nolte and Julia Roberts for inspiration. Or even better yet watch Superman for inspiration from Clark Kent.

The best you can come up with is that Sarah Palins bus has a rendition of the American Flag on it? Please, any Constitutional law that the forefather’s intended to protect the emblem of our Nation went out the window in the 60’s and 70’s when the encroaching liberalism  and Fabian Socialism of the US Supreme Court began chipping away at the true meaning when they said it was guaranteed under the First Ammendment of the US Constitution to burn a flag and to drape a flag over your naked body and prance in a parade.

Don’t stand on your liberal soapbox and preach to America about the supposed evils of commercialism and Sarah Palin. Are you travelling with her in her Motor-Coach? Have you asked her to confide in you her inner secrets as to what she’s doing while she’s travelling?

Perhaps you’re jealous that your not riding along with the press squad that’s waiting on her every breath to announce whether she’s going to run for President in 2012?

Poor little Martin can’t play with the big boys?